Composite Tube Testing and Failure Theory Computational Comparison
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69694/2309-8988/v34a6Keywords:
Finite Element Analysis, Destructive Testing, NX NastranAbstract
Composites are used in lightweight structural designs. This paper describes experimental tests conducted on composite tubes and a comparison with computational results. A test method was developed which involves an applied axial compressive load on tubes fabricated using Unidirectional (UD) carbon fibre set at +35°, to induce compressive and shear stresses along the fibres. Four major failure criteria were compared against test results: Tsai-Wu, Hoffman, Tsai Hill and Maximum Strain. The Hoffman and Tsai-Wu criteria were shown to be accurate and conservative. The Tsai-Hill criteria produced high strength ratios. The Maximum Strain criteria had the highest strength ratio, proving to be the least conservative and deviated most from computational results. This paper shows that the Hoffman and Tsai-Wu failure criteria may be used confidently in applications such as filament winding and continuous pultrusion methods, which are widely used in producing closed sections. Additionally, elastic and shear moduli were varied in simulations to show that small inaccuracies in those properties do not substantially change the maximum failure index output.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 M. Narsai, S. Adali, K. Veale, J. Padayachee (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access. Ownership of copyright of work published remains with the authors, and published in open access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence.